XXX Chats

Free adult webcams in lehigh valley pa

Proving carbon dating wrong

This important and pivotal data was not released publicly by the climate establishment until 2006, and then in an obscure place.[13] Here it is: In reality there was no hotspot, not even a small one.So in reality there is no amplification – the amplification shown in Figure 1 does not exist.[16] Even The climate models predict that when the surface of the earth warms, heat is radiated from the earth into space (on a weekly or monthly time scale).This is because, according to the theory, the warmer surface causes more evaporation and thus there is more heat-trapping water vapor.

The earth’s climate is long-lived and stable— it has never gone into runaway greenhouse, unlike Venus — which strongly suggests that the feedbacks dampen temperature perturbations such as that from extra CO It’s 20 years now, and the average rate of increase in reality is below the lowest trend in the range predicted by the IPCC.

The climate models predict a particular pattern of atmospheric warming during periods of global warming; the most prominent change they predict is a warming in the tropics about 10 km up, the “hotspot”.

The hotspot is the sign of the amplification in their theory (see Figure 1).

Fortunately the climate models got all their major predictions wrong. Every serious skeptical scientist has been consistently saying essentially the same thing for over 20 years, yet most people have never heard the message — here it is, put simply enough for any lay reader willing to pay attention.

will cause more evaporation from the oceans and that this extra water vapor will in turn lead to even more heat trapping because water vapor is the main greenhouse gas.

Comments Proving carbon dating wrong